Posts Tagged ‘progress’

7 Things We Learned from Alan Quarry about Social Media for Social Change

Posted on: January 18th, 2013 by Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council

At a recent event to launch the Friends of Crime Prevention network, we were so fortunate to have Alan Quarry, of Quarry Communications, as our guest. Since we’re all about positive social change, we asked Alan to wax poetic on the power of networks, like Friends of Crime Prevention, to advance social change. Anyone looking for tips on the latest tools, apps and gadgets to use might have been disappointed by Alan’s talk… because really, it’s all about relationships, not the technology, which we already knew. Right?

Creating change that lasts happens in relationships, from one person to another, and these days, often facilitated with the power of social media. Here are Alan’s 7 best thoughts on the principles for engaging people in change.

  1. “We build too many walls and not enough bridges”. Isaac Newton
    Plain and simple…. Walls separate people; Bridges bring people together. Networks can only be successful if they are built on the principles of a good bridge:
    – bridges are intended to facilitate two-way interaction and communication, comings-and-goings and flow of pedestrians and traffic; they connect physical spaces to each other across seemingly uncrossable barriers like water, chasms and gorges
    – bridges are (typically) not controlled by one side or the other
    – bridges do not have trolls! or at least, they shouldn’t!
    – bridges are intended to be multipurpose and can accomplish a great diversity all at once
    – bridges need care and maintenance in order to last for a long time
    – bridges inspire people and we are naturally drawn to them to admire; while many bridges are utilitarian in nature, many more are grand and quite beautiful to look at
    – bridges can often connect very different worlds and be an entrance into exploring a very new and different place
    – bridges can act as ‘neutral territory’, which can be a very good thing at time!
    Having said all that…. bridges can be uncomfortable places for people with a fear of high places. It can take work for some people to engage in these spaces – be patient with them! But if there is a compelling reason for them to be there… they will.
  2. Networking is not about hunting. It is about farming. It’s about cultivating relationships.
    Networking is a key component of building any network, not just Friends of Crime Prevention. But how to engage people who are interested in sticking with the network for the long haul? It’s about building genuine relationships with everyday people. It’s not about head-hunting big names or seemingly important people. Some relationships take longer to develop than others, but guaranteed, an investment in a solid relationship with someone will build stronger connections and commitment to your network.
  3. Build it, and they won’t come
    Photo: Rickety dangerous suspension bridgeEnough said. You can build a bridge, or a network…. but that doesn’t mean everyone will want to take part or use it… especially if it’s poorly designed and built! It’s important to put careful thought, planning and resources into whatever you design. And opportunities to improve it are always there!!
  4. Focus on how to ‘be’ social not how to ‘do’ social
    Many attempt to engage people can ring false when there is a lack of authenticity in the engagement. You can ‘do’ all the right things when it comes to social and community engagement but if your online & in-real-life personality don’t match – people can become quickly disengaged. Sharing good content – relevant, personal and recent – with the right people, at the right time, shows you understand the important of connecting in the right way.
  5. You have to make an effort to connect with people. It’s not called ‘net’sitting. Work at it.
    Yes. And yes. It’s not enough to have online profiles everywhere and attend every community event possible if you don’t actually engage with people. Just because there’s a Facebook page and a Twitter account doesn’t mean people will flock to you in droves. Work at making connections that make sense. Avoid the flailing arm approach to engagement.
  6. Social media is high touch, not high tech
    Photo: Bridge with shops build into the sides and structure
    Like the construction of this bridge, there is some technical thought that goes in to building a network like the Friends of Crime Prevention, and effectively using social media to help it grow. The real success of the bridge in the photo is whether or not people come to gather there when the vendors fill the shops on the sides of the bridge – the high touch part of the equation. We can’t expect technology alone to sustain relationships. We’ve got to do that part in person.
  7. “Be positive – care, share and be friendly”
    According to Alan, this statement is also the Quarry Family motto. But it sure applies to something like advancing the ‘Friends of Crime Prevention’ network. Really, who flocks to be part of something negative, territorial, selfish and unfriendly? I just don’t think it would work for something called ‘Friends of Crime Prevention’!

Truly, Alan’s presentation for the Friends of Crime Prevention event got people talking and primed to help grow the network. People talked about actions they could take as individuals and organizations to help advance the work of crime prevention through social development in their own workplaces, homes, schools, families and neighbourhoods. Ideas are percolating. Discussions are happening. Links are circulating. Tweets are tweeting. Phones are ringing. In all, I’d say, a pretty good ROI for the day.

Return on Interaction, that is.

Thanks Alan Quarry!

What were the stand out ideas you learned from Alan at this event? Is Friends of Crime Prevention on the right track? Love to hear your thoughts – leave a comment!

 

What we’re reading: Network Evaluation

Posted on: May 2nd, 2011 by Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council

Title: Network Evaluation | Cultivating Healthy Networks for Social Change

Authors: The Centre for Social Innovation & Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation

This book addresses that big, hairy question…. How do we know if our networks are really working? In practical and theoretical ways, this small pocket-sized book, digs into the how and why of network evaluation. More than 2/3 of the book is given over to the ‘Evaluator’s Toolbox” – a series of worksheets that help you build a framework for evaluating your network.

I find myself picking up this book every now and again because I find something clever and creative each time I open the pages. It’s a great perspective shifter. As we work on restructuring the network of the Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council to establish the best possible foundation for social change oriented crime prevention, this little book will prove to be very handy.

Pdf copies of the book can be downloaded here. You can also purchase a copy of the book here.

For more information about the book, visit The Centre for Social Innovation.

Making Progress

Posted on: April 15th, 2011 by Smart on Crime

Here at the Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council, we recently hosted our annual working retreat on Friday April 1st. Our theme? “Thinking, acting and changing like a movement”. And did we ever!

 

Photo: 2010 Retreat with Centre for Social Innovation

You might recall that during our community consultation in 2009, community members told us they didn’t know how to be involved in the work of crime prevention other than to be at the Council table. With a Council table of 40+ members, and growing, we came to the realization that this would be unsustainable and not conducive to supporting a more community based movement for social change oriented crime prevention. We very quickly developed a plan to review, revise and restructure the way we operate in order to broaden the opportunities for anyone, from the grassroots to the highest levels of decision making, to become involved in the work of crime prevention through social development.

This work at our retreat day was significant in helping us make progress on our Smart on Crime Priority Direction for Organizational Design. We were able to reflect on the specific characteristics of networks that fit for the way we need to work and created several achievable action steps that can be taken by our network in the next year in order to realize the characteristics.

Our facilitator, Eli Malinsky, of the Centre for Social Innovation in Toronto, designed a day of exercises and thoughtful reflection to help us think beyond being just a network of 40 connected organizations to a more community based movement.

Our work with Eli was also heavily influenced by an article from the Stanford Social Innovation Review called Collective Impact and we will continue our exploration over the next year, of systemic approaches that coordinate action across our community.

Eli also wrote about his reflections and insights on our work together. They can be found here. If you are interested in similar work from the Centre for Social Innovation, you might want to check out their Sandbox workshop series.

Community Consultation 2009 – What We Did and What We Heard

Posted on: December 23rd, 2010 by Smart on Crime

How we got here…

In December 2008, Council approved a broad community consultation approach to gather feedback from Council members, its partners and affiliated organizations and the general public regarding CPC’s work, how we might do its work better or differently and how we might get there.  The consultation process took place over 5 months in late 2009 and early 2010. We engaged participants through an online survey and focus groups. Focus groups were held with staff, volunteers and clients of WRCPC partner agencies. Participants ranged from municipal advisory committees, community and neighbourhoods groups, youth, service groups representing families and children, mental health, housing and homelessness, women’s crisis services, community justice, corrections, policing and rural communities. Over 175 people participated in 18 focus group sessions and over 500 responded to our online survey.  

Graph: 2010 Survey Results

In February 2010, WRCPC’s Facilitating Committee, Alumni group, Community Relations Committee and CPC staff participated in a working session to work on the initial analysis of the survey and focus group data. We worked with Jo Nelson and Aziz , facilitators from ICA Associates, to identify broad themes present in the consultation information.

Photo: 2010 Retreat Dotmocracy List

At the WRCPC annual retreat, Council approved the new priority directions for the 2010 – 2014 plan.

The following section makes recommendations for the Priority Directions that would form the basis of the 2010 – 2014 Future Plan.

Recommendation 1

• To revise the 2003 Strategic Direction “Public Engagement” to become Priority Direction “Education & Learning”

Rationale: this is critical to any initiative that has a prevention mandate. This direction must include a component of learning so that education is rooted in evidence based knowledge and practice. Council must always be engaged in the reciprocal learning process in order to stay current, connected to the grassroots and focused on sustainable social & community change.

Recommendation 2

• To establish a new Priority Direction for “Research”

Rationale: CPC has become recognized for developing high quality research. The Violence Prevention Plan forms a large part of the research agenda at the current time. There is a desire from the community to see additional research available through the CPC.

Recommendation 3

• To revise the 2003 Strategic Direction “Focused Problem Solving to become Priority Direction “Leadership for Social Change”

Rationale: WRCPC is being asked to provide strategic leadership for building momentum and engaging appropriate actors that together, will lead a social and community change process to enhance our collective capacity to increase protective factors and decrease risk factors associated with crime, victimization and fear of crime.

While WRCPC will continue to be involved in problem solving efforts with respect to crime prevention, many partner and affiliated organizations felt this direction from the 2003 Business Plan was too easily confused with direct service which is the work of our partners. Some of the goal statements from the original 2003 Business Plan are still relevant and may be integrated as part of this new Priority Direction.

Recommendation 4

• To establish a new Priority Direction for Organizational Development

Rationale: WRCPC is actively engaged in development activities and capacity building initiatives to ensure that we can effectively support and lead the proposed Future Plan.

Recommendation 5

• To incorporate the Strategic Direction “Partnership Building” as a core principle of the way we work rather than a Strategic Direction

Rationale: Partnership building has become Council’s standard way of working over the last eight years. While some of the goal statements from the 2003 Business Plan are still relevant and may be assumed or revised under the new Priority Directions, partnership building, per se, is no longer warranted as a direction in and of itself. Partnership and collaboration are recognized as a means of accomplishing the work of the crime prevention through social development.

What we heard, in a nutshell…

The Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council is seen as an important and valuable community asset which is very much needed. We were encouraged to develop a healthy Future Plan that builds on the strengths of the community & WRCPC to affect social change.

WRCPC is viewed as a leader of crime prevention initiatives on many levels. The community is looking to WRCPC for this continued leadership. However, it’s easy to stretch this leadership too thin if or when we attempt to ‘be everything to everyone’. In a small community based organization, this ‘everything to everyone’ approach usually results in the following:

  • a loss of a clear organizational focus,
  • an emphasis on reactive response rather than proactive action,
  • outcomes that may have a diluted impact.
  • less effective use of resources

The community identified these issues starting to arise for the Crime Prevention Council. As a result, Council was asked to “work smarter”, “more focused” and with an emphasis on “depth over breadth” rather than simply “work harder” and “do more with less”.

We also learned a lot of important things from the community, such as:

  • a Crime Prevention Council is still relevant and an important part of our community
  • we must be ready to adapt to the changing needs of our community – and the community has changed!
  • we heard that WRCPC is doing great work and that more people across Waterloo Region should know about this business of crime prevention through social development. Many of our initiatives are well known – Say Hi campaign, In the Mind’s Eye Film + Forum event – but the community didn’t know these were WRCPC initiatives. The community encouraged us to be bold in taking credit for the work that we do
  • the community also suggested that we provide more clarity on the message of crime prevention and the role that we play

Lastly, the community consultation also affirmed the various roles that CPC undertakes in order to accomplish our work. These roles were articulated in the 2003 Business Plan and they include:

  • Catalyst
  • Resource
  • Educator
  • Connector
  • Advocate